Godless and Goodness: The Connection That’ll Make You Question Everything

In the minds of many people religion and morality are often intertwined. Not surprisingly, the question frequently arises: Why do atheists follow a moral code instead of simply doing whatever they feel like? Today, we’ll focus on the nature of morality, its origins, and its place in society – both religious and secular.

That idea that morality and religion are inseparable has been ingrained in many cultures for centuries, so much so that most don’t give it another thought. Consequently, some wonder how those without religious beliefs can possibly navigate the murky waters of right and wrong, as it was their religion that invented morality.

Nearly 3% of the adult population in the United States is either in prison or on parole, which is particularly noteworthy because the US is widely recognized as one of the most religious countries in the Western world, so much so that according to Pew Research 55% American population pray daily while this is merely 6% in the UK, 30% in Greece, 60% in Turkey, and 87% in Iran.

If the hypothesis that religion is the sole or primary source of morality were to be true, one would expect to see lower rates of incarceration in such a devout nation.

Conversely, let’s turn our attention to Japan. In this East Asian country, where Abrahamic religions have not made a significant impact, we find one of the most peaceful societies in the world. Japan’s low crime rates and social harmony stand in stark contrast to the assumption that religious belief is necessary for a moral society.

The plot thickens when we consider certain Middle Eastern countries. Despite having highly religious populations, many of these nations grapple with widespread corruption. This further challenges the notion that religious devotion automatically translates to moral behavior on a societal level.

Whether religion is detrimental to morality is a separate matter, and I will leave that discussion to others. However, the examples given at least illustrate that religion is not a must for morality, and religiosity does not necessarily translate into moral societies.

So, if religion isn’t the sole source of morality, what is? The answer may lie in what we might call “common decency” – a basic sense of right and wrong that seems to transcend cultural and religious boundaries.

Think about your own circle of friends and acquaintances. Chances are, you know people from various backgrounds – some religious, some not. Among your religious friends, there may be those who are deeply devout yet not extreme in their views. Now, ask yourself: Is it really the fear of divine punishment that keeps these individuals from engaging in harmful or illegal activities?

For most people, regardless of their beliefs, the decision not to harm others or break laws stems from a more fundamental place. It’s rooted in empathy, social conditioning, and an understanding of the consequences of our actions – both for ourselves and for society at large.

But what drives people, whether they believe in a god or not, to follow moral codes?

First, empathy and compassion matter a lot. People naturally understand and share the feelings of others, and this empathy guides many of our moral choices.

Second, we benefit from living in a stable society. Following moral rules helps keep things stable and makes life better for everyone.

Third, philosophical thinking provides another reason. Throughout their lives, most people spend a lot of time sorting out what is right and wrong, and, when the time comes, act on their instincts.

There’s also an evolutionary angle. Some believe our sense of right and wrong comes from the need for cooperation and helping each other, which helped our ancestors survive.

Additionally, acting morally usually leads to good outcomes for us personally, such as stronger relationships, a good reputation, and a clear conscience.

Cultural influence plays a role too. We are shaped by the values and norms of our culture, many of which involve moral ideas.

Finally, acting ethically often aligns with our own long-term interests. It helps build trust, creates positive relationships, and contributes to a healthy society.

One of the most compelling arguments for the independence of morality from religion is the remarkable similarity of basic ethical principles across different cultures and belief systems. Concepts like fairness, reciprocity, and the prohibition of murder are nearly universal, appearing in societies with vastly different religious backgrounds – or none at all.

This universality suggests that these moral principles arise from something more fundamental than religious texts or traditions. They seem to emerge from our shared human experience, our need to live cooperatively, and our capacity for reason and empathy.

Of course, discussing morality – religious or secular—is never simple. Both religious and non-religious moral systems face criticism.

Religious morality is often criticized for being rigid or based on outdated cultural norms, which can lead to conflicts when different religious groups have opposing moral views.

Secular morality, on the other hand, is sometimes accused of being relativistic or lacking a solid foundation. Critics argue that without a divine authority, moral rules become arbitrary. However, the existence of God does not depend on the utility of the concept of God.

As societies become increasingly diverse and interconnected, it makes sense to move beyond the false dichotomy of religious morality versus moral chaos. Humans – religious and non-religious alike—are capable of moral reasoning, ethical behavior, and compassion.

Rather than judgementally asking why atheists follow moral codes, perhaps everyone should ask themselves how we can encourage ethical behavior regardless of belief systems.

#MoralityAndReligion #EthicsWithoutGod #SecularEthics